Skip to main content

Internet of Things: Human Capital Management [Expectations vs. Reality]


Imagine an office work planner embedded within the **Sociometric Badge of an employee. The work planner gives you instruction on when to start which task. Tells you to relax and alarms you to drink water at frequent intervals.

** A sociometric badge (commonly known as a "sociometer") is a wearable electronic device capable of automatically measuring the amount of face-to-face interaction, conversational time, physical proximity to other people, and physical activity levels using social signals derived from vocal features, body motion, and relative location

This (Workplace Planner + Sociometric Badge) linked to every meeting room in your organization. You can actually rate a meeting from your Badge itself at your convenience.

Your badge tells you to prepone the meeting as you have movie booked during that time and also tells you the meeting schedule of your counterpart so both of you can fix meeting at best available time, saving you from multiple from and to mail communication. The Sociometric Badge also informs everybody in your workplace about your health, so that everybody can plan their work accordingly.

Yes, I am talking about Internet of Things in Human Capital. The word is very old but till now the use is very limited. Be it the Chinese surveillance System where street cameras uses face detection technology to monitor each and every individual or manufacturing utility using sensors to detect the repair and overhaul needs of machinery.

Till now, only a few organizations have experimented IoT in Human Capital. Internet of things essentially means different devices, Software linked together to achieve one common purpose i.e. better business outcome. Take a break and now think what will be the better business outcome in case of Human Capital. It should be ‘Efficiency’ or ‘Job Satisfaction’ as satisfaction is directly linked to Efficiency and efficiency to business outcome.

Deloitte Case Study
Measuring humans at work

With more than 250,000 professionals serving clients all over the world, Deloitte has many opportunities to experiment and use these tools. Consider how sociometric badges helped Deloitte Canada redesign its work environment.

Increasingly, business and HR leaders see the work environment as a major driver of productivity and engagement and are moving to align research findings with actual workspaces. For instance, research shows that many people work best in small teams, so companies are knocking down walls, adding coffee bars, and creating open offices all over the world. (Of course, this isn’t universal: Some studies show that these moves actually reduce productivity for introverts)

Deloitte Canada recruited a set of volunteers to wear sociometric badges—measuring location, voice, and movement—to assess which aspects of work were positive and negative. The devices could hear voice tones and deduce when people were under stress; the data-based system correlated factors such as “who is in the meeting,” “how much time are we spending together,” and even “who is pushing back in his chair” with employee stress levels and other measures of productivity.

The results of the project gave Deloitte Canada the following insights:

è Cross-disciplinary teams are higher-performing and more engaging than when service lines work alone (on many accounts, Deloitte often has consulting, audit, and tax professionals working independently).
è Offices with more windows and more light promote more “happy people” than spaces that are more closed-in and private.
è Large conference rooms are more conducive to positive meetings than small conference rooms.
è People tend to prefer to work in smaller groups, and working physically closer to others increases enjoyment and productivity. (MIT management professor Thomas Allen established this in the late 1970s, codified in the so-called Allen curve.)
è Deloitte Canada used these findings, and others, to redesign all of its major offices and teams.

From above study, Deloitte has considered “QUALITY” as an aspect while studying results instead of “QUANTITY”. Offices with more windows, Large Conference rooms, and Small teams all are examples of “Quality”. Here we are connecting to Humans and not machinery. You can’t place a camera on some human and tell him to work.

If you start dealing ‘HUMANS’ like Machines they will start measuring their performance by numbers and not quality. In a study published at large insurance firm, two groups were formed. One group is monitored while performing their work and other is not. During Self-appraisal, first group identified ‘Production quantity’ as the most significant factor while the other identified ‘Production quality’.

Few Ideas:-

è Like in case of Machines, IoT measure the suitable temperature for machines to work similarly when we are talking about Humans, it should be air quality index, lightening and noise which impacts his/her efficiency levels.
è Another factor is ‘Temporary State of Mind’ or in short ‘Mood’. The IoT should find out the factors which makes employee happy and can personalize the employee desktop as per his Mood. The input can come from social media pages.
è IoT can be used to provide latest information to employee in connection to his work.
è All the organizations can be interlinked, so that while hiring for one specific position, employer can check the full track record of employee online, his major projects and team members involved.

Some Concerns:

è Employee should agree to share his private data and being monitored continuously by employer
è The practice adopted by employer should takes into consideration the data privacy laws
è Employer should use carefully the data gathered as there is ample scope of misinterpretation of data that leads to bad decisions

All purpose of all these technology and ideas is to increase business outcome which is the ultimate guiding factor for any organization.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Difference Between IT Governance and GEIT (Governance of enterprise IT)

Chapter 1 Concepts of governance and management of enterprise IT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN IT GOVERNANCE AND GEIT According to our study material, IT Governance refers to the system in which directors of the enterprise evaluate, direct and monitor (First they evaluate i.e. form an opinion, then they direct i.e. what should be done and then in last they monitor i.e. what should be done is actually being done.)  IT Management to ensure  effectiveness, accountability and compliance  of IT. My dear friends, note the line (effectiveness, accountability and compliance of IT) i.e. only of IT. Now what is GEIT???? lets start with a definition..... GEIT is the system by which IT activities in a company are directed and controlled to achieve business objectives with the ultimate objective of meeting stakeholders needs.  And as given in earlier post  Corporate Governance  is a system by which  company  is  directed and controlled  to achieve objectives of increasing stakeholder

Work Day Interface PECI (Human Capital Management) Introduction

Workday is a very popular Human Capital Management Software but they do not have good Payroll Processing Capabilities which is the final outcome of a Human Capital Software. To address this, they have given a good interface i.e. PECI Interface i.e. (Payroll Effective Change Interface). It is latest interface version given by Workday for integrating Human Capital Software with a Payroll and Statutory Compliance Software for calculating organisation tax compliance and Employee Salary. In this article, let us discuss the strengths and weakness of Workday interface and how organisations can overcome that. Strengths: This workday interface extract all the transactions in XML format which is very easy to analyse and study for any potential error or gap. It works on Pay Group ID logic where data is interfaced as per pay group id mapped to employees. With each transaction, Workday PECI use 'Update' or 'Added' Flag so Payroll vendor can easily identify the tran

Macau (SAR) Tax with Calculator

Link to Macau Tax Calculator:  http://www.dsf.gov.mo/tax/tax_downloadapps.aspx?lang=en Introduction ·          Individuals are subject to tax on income arising in Macau. Residency of an individual has no significance in determining tax liability. ·          Professional Tax is imposed on employment and self-employment income arising in Macau. For the purpose of tax, taxpayers are divided into employees and professional practitioners. ·          Tax Year End is 31st December. ·          PAYE System is used to withhold taxes ·          TFN: When an individual commences employment, they will be requested to quote their Tax File Number (TFN) to their employer. ·          Tax Amount is rounded up to the nearest dollar. ·          When are estimates/prepayments/withholding of tax due in Macau? For example: monthly, annually, both, and so on. ·          Monthly for expatriates, quarterly for Macau residents and non-residents with a working permit. Types of Taxable C